
The graphic at left is a cobbling of two photos I created to illustrate that what comes next for radio is not ‘radio’, yet radio will be the seed to something completely unique.
In previous posts, I’ve laid out various underserved (and thus, untapped) radio audiences. So, what’s the natural progression? What of so-called new media? One of the reasons why I targeted the more plugged-in demographics of minorities is because multi-platform communications are now a way of life for them. That is not to say that radio is obsolete, in their minds.
It’s been said that radio is dying; but that’s been said before. What saved it? Innovation in format. Today, the natural progression is innovation in format and multi-platform flexibility.
Why can’t a radio service blog, tweet, and text with the best of them? It would keep the service forward-leaning and responsive in a way that mere broadcasting cannot. It also lowers the bar for participation. Participation is paramount in reimagined radio. So is content overload.
Participation because as we mentioned earlier, the most technically savvy are the most prone to feeling a need for tangible community.
Content Overload because it is expected. Younger folks in general have the expectation of unlimited choice in media consumption at their fingertips. YouTube alone houses unknown millions of media clips.
These are two tandem (yet distinct) desires of the Wired Generation. How can ‘old media’ accommodate them? Take a cue from the project I am currently working on: Vocalo.org.
One thing Vocalo.org does very well is straddle new and old media (it is a website as well as a terrestrial public radio station). It tweets and it blogs. It juliennes. What we have learned, though, is that many folks are strictly on-line community members, while many listen to the signal and never venture to the site. There is, of course, a continuum of use, and a number of reasons for the usage patterns (no signal in their region on one end, intermittent internet access on the other).
Each platform (old & new media) gives audience a distinct experience:
Vocalo.org (the website) gives audience the chance to tailor their listening experience, choosing from various categories of user-uploaded content (not unlike YouTube). They could even upload their own content (consisting of audio, photo, text, or video (not unlike a Facebook upload). Additionally, they can network with other audience members via the social networking interface, comment in the Shoutbox (an Instant Message box with questions tied to the live broadcast) and they can listen live to a stream of the broadcast.
Vocalo.org (the radio station) gives audiences a hosted listening experience of content culled from the website and mixed with music and topical conversation. It allows access through a hotline (that is on during all live broadcast hours), and the potential to be guests Additionally, responses on the Shoutbox are often read over the air) as are responses to Tweets, Myspace, and Facebook updates from the hosts).
So, again, I say: What’s the natural progression? Vocalo.org was born because Chicago Public Radio was (and is) keenly aware of many of the audience and media trends listed in posts below. At Vocalo.org’s inception, it was identified as a service for people of color, teen to middle-aged. Unfortunately, as the aesthetics have been in a state of constant evolution, that target audience was not evident. Vocalo.org was also identified as a project whose purpose was to use new and old media in a compelling, audience-driven way. I applaud the attempt to integrate new media and old in a degree that has seldom been seen. I further applaud the idea of a station targeting “those underserved and underrepresented by traditional media outlets”. Unfortunately, these are two distinct missions. How to integrate the two into a sound and web product that sounds cohesive (and yet fulfills both missions?).
Ah, that’s the rub…..
Let’s return to the dual desires (or better still, expectations) of the young consumer that I mentioned earlier:
Participation and Content Overload
In reality, the issue is not that these desires are unfulfilled. The issue is that third and four elements are not named:
Favored Referral and Razzle-Dazzle
Favored Referral
Young people often don’t have one source for news & information or one source for new culture. They cobble together a bookmark folder full of them (among these are both blogs and “big media”). But of course, who doesn’t love a favorite plugged-in friend who can fill you in on what the blogosphere is buzzing about (and what they missed on your side of town), who knows about that a quirky art exhibit, or some great pizza for the money, or who’s hiring, or what’s going on with that City contract for work on the street where you live. The Favored-Word is sometimes hard to find (especially on a local level, and especially for many minority communities). What if a radio station became Word-of-mouth amplified… with one essential element:
Razzle-Dazzle
Every show I’ve ever produced I called (internally) a circus: not because it was out of control, but because it featured a level of simulated suspense and multiple programming elements going on at once. Would it all work out? Would the safety net hold? I let listeners in on some of the behind the scenes glitches. But, I never, ever relinquished control of the quality of the show they heard. Even if every broadcasting element save the mic failed me: the show would go on. It always sounded firmly warm, personable, and truly for the listener. Razzle-Dazzle is a combination of things. It’s not just bells and whistles (i.e. the newest interface). It’s showmanship, attention to detail, attitude, and connecting with the audience… critical things that are oft missed on media sites that really simple house content. A spectacular magic trick is crucial, but getting the audience’s heart is absolutely everything.

excerpted from a post by Bruce Dixon of Black Agenda Report
Hip Hop was created out of lack and fat. There was a lack of resources: alongside a shortage of Music Education in inner city schools, there was limited access to instruments (but a wealth of recorded matter). Conversely, there was a fatness in community… hip hop was born at a party, it was a communal happening that united a neighborhood through sound.